Download Whitepaper

We collaborate with best-in-class platforms, consultants, and technology providers to deliver seamless, future-proof solutions, built to grow with your organization.

Why the Three Lines of Defense Model Is Outdated? What Every Board Should Know About the Three Lines Model

Phuong Pham
October 13, 2025
5 min read

The Three Lines of Defence (3LOD) framework has guided risk and assurance for decades. But in 2020, the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) replaced it with the Three Lines Model (3LM) — a more collaborative, governance-driven, and value-focused approach.
This article explains what changed, why 3LOD no longer fits today’s complex risk landscape, and how boards can apply 3LM to strengthen governance and strategic decision-making.

What Is the Three Lines of Defence (3LOD)?

The Three Lines of Defence (3LOD) model is a governance framework designed by the IIA to clarify roles and responsibilities in risk management and internal control.
It defines three lines of accountability:

  1. First Line – Operational Management: Owns and manages risks within day-to-day processes.
  2. Second Line – Risk & Compliance Functions: Provides oversight, expertise, and policy frameworks.
  3. Third Line – Internal Audit: Offers independent assurance that governance and controls are effective.

The model provided clarity in accountability, but over time it reinforced silos and created duplication. Organizations began treating risk as compliance paperwork rather than a driver of strategic value.

The IIA's Three Lines Model (2020)

The Shift to the Three Lines Model (3LM)

In response, the IIA introduced the Three Lines Model (3LM) in 2020 — modernizing the approach to corporate governance and assurance.
3LM reframes the model from defence to alignment: emphasizing collaboration, shared accountability, and integrated governance across all functions.

Despite this update, many firms still rely on the outdated 3LOD framework. Understanding why it changed is essential for board members and executives overseeing enterprise risk management (ERM) programs.

Why the IIA Replaced the Three Lines of Defence Model (3LOD)

Over time, the Three Lines of Defence model exposed deep structural flaws. The IIA’s 2020 revision incorporated feedback from more than 2,000 stakeholders to address those weaknesses:

  • Siloed mindset: The “defence” framing reinforced separation instead of collaboration.
  • Role ambiguity: Overlapping responsibilities blurred accountability.
  • False assurance: Control functions became overloaded with expectation to “catch everything.”
  • Compliance over strategy: Risk was treated as paperwork, not decision intelligence.

The shift to 3LM wasn’t cosmetic — it redefined the relationship between risk, governance, and performance.

From Defence to Alignment: What Changed in 3LM

The Three Lines Model is built around six core principles that reflect today’s reality:

Principle What It Means
Alignment over Defense Lines collaborate toward shared outcomes, not guard silos.
Value Creation & Protection Risk is part of strategic decision-making, not a separate function.
Tailored Application The model adapts to each organization’s context and maturity.
Empowered Governance Boards play an active, integrated oversight role.
Shared Accountability Clear ownership across all functions.
Collaborative Communication Dialogue replaces linear reporting.

In practice, this means less rigidity, more interaction, and stronger linkage between operational execution and board oversight.

3LOD vs 3LM: Key Differences in Practice

3LOD vs 3LM: What Actually Changes
Theme Old 3LOD New 3LM Key Change
Mindset “Defense” and control Coordination and value From reactive to integrated
Objective Manage risk & ensure compliance Support strategic decisions Risk becomes strategic
Role Division Strictly separated Fluid and collaborative Shared accountability
Governance Board outside the lines Board integrated Stronger oversight
Assurance 3rd line as checker Audit adds insight & value Partnership approach
Implementation Fixed silos Adapted to maturity Flexible, scalable governance

Why Some Firms Still Use 3LOD

If the IIA retired the model years ago, why do many consulting firms still use it?
Because change disrupts commercial comfort zones.

  • Legacy structures: Many clients are still built on 3LOD frameworks.
  • Consulting economics: Complexity keeps service pipelines alive.
  • Knowledge inertia: Not all practitioners understand 3LM deeply.
  • Low awareness at board level: Few directors question what’s presented.

This perpetuates outdated thinking and leaves organizations less resilient to modern, interconnected risks.

RM1 vs RM2: A Mindset Shift

Think of 3LOD as Risk Management 1.0: compliance-led, reactive, and document-heavy.
The 3LM model represents Risk Management 2.0: value-driven, forward-looking, and embedded in decision-making.

If your risk program feels like box-checking, you’re still in RM1.
If risk insights directly influence decisions and investments, you’ve reached RM2.

Questions Every Board Should Ask

Boards don’t need to redesign the model overnight — but they must ensure governance keeps pace.
Ask these questions to see where your organization stands:

  • Which model do we actually operate under: 3LOD or 3LM?
  • How does our risk framework support strategy, not just compliance?
  • What evidence shows that risk management adds value?
  • Do our lines coordinate — or merely coexist?
  • Are we relying on consulting templates or evidence-based practices?

Good governance starts with asking better questions.

Putting 3LM into Practice: The Role of GRC Tools

Transitioning to 3LM is about operationalizing collaboration. Technology can enable that shift — but not replace it.

Modern GRC tools like CERRIX support the Three Lines Model by:

  • Creating shared visibility: One platform for Risk, Compliance, and Audit, with consistent data and dashboards.
  • Automating accountability: Assign tasks and reviews across lines with clear ownership and traceability.
  • Enhancing assurance: Link risks, controls, incidents, and audits in one environment for real-time insight.
  • Connecting governance with execution: Dashboards give boards and committees continuous oversight of control health and risk exposure.

Technology doesn’t create good governance — it makes it measurable, transparent, and sustainable.

Conclusion

The Three Lines of Defence served its purpose in an earlier era.
But today, governance requires integration, not isolation.

Boards and executives who continue to rely on 3LOD are holding onto a structure that limits agility and collaboration.
The Three Lines Model reflects a modern organization — one where accountability, transparency, and strategy are aligned.

FAQ

What are the three lines in risk management?
They are operational management (first line), risk and compliance oversight (second line), and internal audit assurance (third line).

Why was the Three Lines of Defence model updated?
Because its “defence” mindset encouraged silos and compliance thinking. The updated 3LM fosters collaboration and alignment with strategy.

How can technology support the Three Lines Model?
Integrated GRC platforms like CERRIX provide a single source of truth for risks, controls, and assurance — enabling real-time insights and stronger governance.

Share this post

Related content

Why the Three Lines of Defense Model Is Outdated? What Every Board Should Know About the Three Lines Model

Three Lines Model Explained: Why Boards Must Move Beyond 3LOD

What Is ISO 31000 and How Does It Work?

Discover what ISO 31000 is, how it works, and why it’s essential for risk management in 2025. Learn the principles, framework, and how tools like CERRIX help organizations turn ISO 31000 into practice.

How to Write an Incident Report That Stands Up to Audits

Learn how to write incident reports that are clear, evidence-backed, and audit-ready. Includes a template, best practices, and compliance alignment for risk professionals.

How to Implement ISO 31000: Real-Time Risk Decisions with AI‑Enabled Tools

Discover how to move beyond compliance and operationalize ISO 31000 using AI, real-time dashboards, and structured risk assessments. Learn from webinar insights and best practices tailored for financial services and regulated industries.

compliance team looking for ISMS

What’s Blocking Your ISMS Rollout? 7 Fixable Challenges for Financial Institutions

Discover the 7 biggest blockers in ISMS rollout for financial institutions—and how to solve them. Learn practical strategies to secure buy-in, define scope, streamline controls, and prepare for ISO 27001 certification.

working compliance manager

Trends Driving ISMS Adoption in 2025: What Risk & Compliance Leaders Need to Know

Discover the top trends pushing organizations toward ISMS adoption in 2025—from regulatory changes and remote work to threat evolution and AI. Learn what to prioritize to stay ahead in risk and compliance.

ISMS

What Is an ISMS? A Practical Guide for Risk & Compliance Leaders in 2025

An Information Security Management System (ISMS) is more than policy—it’s your organization’s shield against evolving threats, regulation, and reputation risk. Discover what ISMS means, how to implement it, and why it matters in 2025.

AI in GRC

The Intelligent Future of GRC: How AI is Reshaping Governance, Risk & Compliance in 2025

Explore how AI is transforming GRC in 2025—from predictive insights and automation to ethical oversight. Learn what features matter, what risks to manage.

How Do You Implement an ISMS in Financial Services Without Slowing Down Innovation?

Implementing an ISMS in financial services? Explore a practical, risk-aligned roadmap tailored for banks, fintechs, and insurers to meet ISO 27001, GDPR, and DORA compliance—without compromising agility.

How Do You Build a Robust ISMS Framework Based on ISO 27001?

Learn how to build a robust ISMS framework aligned with ISO 27001. Discover the key components—people, policies, processes, and controls—to strengthen security and achieve compliance.

When to Conduct Risk Assessments: 6 Enterprise-Critical Moments

Learn when to conduct risk assessments—annual, quarterly, after incidents or change—and how CERRIX ensures continuous compliance.

How do you build a system of quality management that works under ISQM 1?

Learn how to build a system of quality management under ISQM 1. Move beyond compliance to an operational model that proves audit quality.

Top GRC Platforms Compared: Risk Assessment Tools for 2025

Discover the top GRC platforms for 2025 with a focus on risk assessment tools.

What Are Risk Scoring Methods for Financial Institutions? [2025 Guide]

From Risk Assessment to Risk Management: Moving Beyond Checklists in 2025

Understand the evolution from risk assessment to strategic risk management in 2025. Learn why leading organizations are embedding risk into decision-making—and how GRC platforms like CERRIX support this shift.

What is risk management? A strategic guide for leaders in 2025

How Audit Firms Embed ISQM into Daily Practice

In our second ISQM webinar, experts from RSM, Grant Thornton, and CERRIX shared practical insights on how audit firms can embed ISQM into the heart of their operations.

What is the maximum fine for GDPR violations?

Discover the maximum fine for GDPR violations: €20 million or 4% of global turnover. Learn the two-tier penalty system, notable examples, and how to prevent costly data protection breaches.

How do you conduct a GDPR compliance assessment?

Learn how to conduct a GDPR compliance assessment with our step-by-step guide covering data mapping, documentation requirements, and 6 common gaps organizations discover. Reduce risks and ensure compliance.

What are the main requirements of GDPR?

Discover the 7 essential GDPR requirements every organization must follow. Learn about data protection principles, individual rights, breach handling, and practical compliance strategies in this comprehensive guide.

third party risk

How often should you review third party risks?

Discover how often to review third party risks with our tiered approach: quarterly for high-risk vendors, semi-annually for medium, and annually for low-risk partnerships.

What should be included in a vendor due diligence process?

Discover what a comprehensive vendor due diligence process should include: financial stability assessment, security controls, compliance verification, risk evaluation criteria, and ongoing monitoring frameworks.

How do you assess vendor risk?

Learn how to implement vendor risk assessment in 5 clear steps. Discover essential strategies to protect your organization from third-party threats and ensure regulatory compliance.

What are the main types of supplier risks?

Discover the 5 critical types of supplier risks that threaten your business continuity. Learn effective strategies to identify, assess, and mitigate these vulnerabilities before they impact your operations.

What is a compliance risk assessment?

Discover how to conduct an effective compliance risk assessment to identify regulatory risks, prevent violations, and transform compliance challenges into strategic business advantages.

How do you report compliance violations?

Learn how to report compliance violations effectively through proper channels while protecting your identity. Discover documentation requirements, whistleblower protections, and what happens after you submit a report.

How do you calculate risk probability and impact?

Learn how to calculate risk probability and impact using proven methods. Transform uncertainty into measurable risks for better decision-making and strategic resource allocation.

What is third party risk management?

Learn what third party risk management is, how it protects your organization from external threats, and the steps to implement an effective TPRM program to ensure compliance and security.

What are the benefits of risk management for businesses?

Discover how risk management benefits businesses by protecting financial health, improving decision-making, ensuring compliance, and creating competitive advantages that transform threats into opportunities.

What is a risk register and how do you create one?

Wondering what a risk register is? Learn how to create this essential tool to identify, assess, and manage organizational risks effectively and boost compliance.

How often do ISO certifications need to be renewed?

Wondering about ISO certification renewal? Understand the three-year cycle, annual surveillance audits, and preparation strategies to maintain compliance seamlessly.

What documents are required for ISO 27001 implementation?

Discover the mandatory and recommended documents required for successful ISO 27001 implementation. Learn how to organize, create and maintain effective ISMS documentation that satisfies auditors and enhances security.

Do I need a consultant for ISO certification?

Wondering if you need a consultant for ISO certification? Discover key factors to make the right decision for your organization based on expertise, resources, and certification complexity.

What industries benefit most from ISO certification?

Discover which industries gain the most value from ISO certification. Financial services, technology, healthcare, and manufacturing organizations see superior ROI while enhancing compliance and competitive advantage.

Can a company lose its ISO certification?

Can a company lose its ISO certification? Discover the 8 common reasons, consequences, and prevention strategies to protect your business reputation and investment.

How long does it take to get ISO 9001 certified?

Discover how long ISO 9001 certification takes, from 4-12 months depending on your organization's size and complexity. Learn the key phases, challenges, and ways to accelerate your quality management journey.

What is ISO 27001 and why is it important for businesses?

Discover how ISO 27001 certification protects your business data, builds customer trust, and ensures regulatory compliance in today's high-risk digital landscape. A complete implementation guide.

From Spreadsheets to GRC Software: Why Pension Funds Need a Modern Approach to Risk Management

What to know about GRC software for nis2

Explore how GRC software helps businesses comply with the NIS2 Directive, enhancing cybersecurity and risk management.

Can automation reduce compliance costs?

Explore how automation can reduce compliance costs, enhancing efficiency and ensuring regulatory adherence.

What industries benefit from compliance automation?

Discover which 6 industries benefit most from compliance automation and how it transforms regulatory burdens into strategic advantages through risk reduction and operational efficiency.

How automation streamlines compliance processes

Discover how compliance process automation reduces costs by 40-60% while minimizing errors and risks. Transform manual workflows into strategic advantages for your organization.

Is cybersecurity compliance automation secure?

Discover if cybersecurity compliance automation strengthens or risks your security posture. Learn implementation best practices that enhance protection while simplifying regulatory management.

Does automation reduce compliance risks?

Explore how automation impacts compliance risks, its benefits, limitations, and integration strategies.

Key sectors affected by NIS2 compliance

Explore the impact of NIS2 compliance on key sectors like energy and healthcare, enhancing cybersecurity and data protection.

Are automated compliance tools reliable?

Exploring the reliability of automated compliance tools and their role in cybersecurity.

DORA compliance checklist for beginners

An essential guide for beginners to understand and implement DORA compliance effectively.

Key benefits of adhering to DORA compliance

Explore the key benefits of DORA compliance, enhancing security, efficiency, and regulatory adherence.

NIS2 compliance: top strategies for success

Explore effective strategies for NIS2 compliance to enhance cybersecurity and regulatory adherence.

EU AI Act vs. GDPR: what's the difference?

Explore the key differences and overlaps between the EU AI Act and GDPR, focusing on regulation, impact, and compliance.

Can GRC tools predict compliance risks?

Exploring if GRC tools can predict compliance risks and their role in risk management.

Can a GRC tool adapt to regulatory changes?

Explore if GRC tools can adapt to regulatory changes, covering compliance management and risk assessment.

How does AI governance impact compliance?

Explore the impact of AI governance on compliance, focusing on regulation, ethics, and risk management.

How to prepare for the EU AI Act implementation?

Learn how to prepare for the EU AI Act implementation with practical steps for compliance.

Is your business ready for the EU AI Act?

Explore readiness for the EU AI Act with insights on compliance, challenges, and strategic planning for businesses.

How does DORA compliance impact financial sectors?

Discover how DORA compliance strengthens financial sectors, enhancing risk management, digital resilience, and regulatory standards.

What is DORA compliance and why does it matter?

Explore DORA compliance, its significance in financial services, and strategies for effective implementation.

DORA compliance vs other regulatory standards

Explore the differences between DORA compliance and other regulatory standards, focusing on financial regulations and cybersecurity.

Can automation improve DORA compliance efforts?

Explore how automation can enhance DORA compliance efforts by streamlining processes and ensuring ongoing monitoring.

How to integrate GRC with existing systems?

Integrating GRC with existing systems enhances compliance, risk management, and efficiency.

Can settlement discipline improve market stability?

Exploring how settlement discipline can enhance market stability, focusing on its benefits and challenges.

Why real-time analytics in GRC are vital

Real-time analytics in GRC is crucial for proactive risk management and continuous compliance monitoring.

Top 10 Features Every GRC Tool Should Have in 2025

Explore essential GRC tool features like integration, risk management, compliance, governance, and customization.

How to prepare your business for CSDR compliance?

Guide to preparing your business for CSDR compliance, covering key strategies, challenges, and technology solutions.

Embedding ISQM 1 into the DNA of Your Audit Firm: A Risk-Based Approach to Quality Management

Discover how to implement ISQM 1 with a risk-based approach. Learn how audit firms can embed quality management into daily operations and governance.

CERRIX User Conference 2025

On March 12, 2025, industry leaders, assurance experts, and CERRIX customers came together for the CERRIX User Conference 2025—a day of knowledge-sharing, insightful discussions, and collaboration on the future of risk management, compliance, and AI-driven GRC solutions.

From Spreadsheets to GRC Software: Why Pension Funds Need a Modern Approach to Risk Management

CERRIX and BR1GHT Strengthen Long-term Partnership to Enhance Governance, Risk, Compliance and Audit Solutions

Implementing DORA: From Compliance to Long-Term Resilience

GRC Software Adoption: Overcoming Challenges & Achieving Compliance Success